Article III of the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court and its powers. You’d think it slightly nonsensical for a justice of said court to quibble with that very Constitution. Ketanji Brown Jackson has never much cared for sense.
In a scathing dissent, Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson accuses her colleagues of viewing a case through the “distorted lens of pure textualism.” Textualism is a school of interpretation that approaches the law, including the Constitution, according to its plain meaning. A textualist asks: What would an ordinary person understand this law to mean?
Christ Almighty, textualism is the ENTIRE goddamn point of the Supreme Court, Justice Jackson.
— Nan Hayworth, M.D. (@NanHayworth) June 23, 2025
Resign from SCOTUS and run for legislative office. (And please lose.)
Democrats are hopeless--the spoiled children of prosperity wrought by a market ecosystem they seek to destroy. https://t.co/JAgpC9JvoY
